Dear fellow Patriot,

Gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently announced the Obama Administration will be working hand-in-glove with the UN to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty.”

Disguised as an “International Arms Control Treaty” to fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the UN Small Arms Treaty is in fact a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

I’m helping lead the fight to defeat this radical treaty in the United States Senate and I want your help.

Please join me by taking a public stand against this outright assault on our national sovereignty by signing the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey.

Ultimately, the UN Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps.

But looking at previous versions of the UN Small Arms Treaty, you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.


If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN Small Arms Treaty would almost certainly FORCE the U.S. to:

*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

I'm sure I don't have to tell you that this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” -- it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe.

These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.

And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

That’s why I was so glad to hear that the National Association for Gun Rights is leading the fight to stop this assault on our Constitution!


The truth is there’s no time to waste.

You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.

The fact is the last thing the gun-grabbers at the UN and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical legislation.

They’ve made that mistake before, and we’ve made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the UN Small Arms Treaty into law since the mid-1990s.

But now time may not be on our side.

In fact, we’re likely to only have a few weeks to defeat the treaty when they make their move.

And we definitely don’t have a President in the White House who will oppose this treaty.

So our ONE AND ONLY CHANCE to stop the UN Small Arms Treaty is during the ratification process in the U.S. Senate.

As you know, it takes 67 Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

With new pro-gun champions joining me in the Senate, rounding up enough votes to kill this thing should be easy, right?

Unfortunately, that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Even with the Republican tidal wave in 2010, there still isn’t a pro-gun majority in the Senate to kill ratification of the treaty.

You know just as well as I do how few Senators are truly “pro-gun.”

Not only that, but many Senators get “queasy” about killing treaties for fear of “embarrassing” the President -- especially with “international prestige” at stake.

They look at ratifying treaties much like approving the President’s Supreme Court nominees.

Remember how many Senators turned their back on us and voted to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor?

A dozen more only voted against Sotomayor after receiving massive grassroots pressure from the folks back home.

So if we’re going to defeat the UN Small Arms Treaty gun owners have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it’s too late!

Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?

Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?

If you said “Yes” to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

Your survey will put you squarely on the record AGAINST the UN Small Arms Treaty.


And along with your signed survey, I hope you’ll send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 to help finance this battle.

With your generous contribution, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue contacting Second Amendment supporters to turn up the heat on targeted U.S. Senators.

Not only that, but they’re preparing a massive program to launch the second this treaty is brought before the Senate.

Direct mail.  Phones.  E-mail.  Blogs.  Guest editorials.  Press conferences.  Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits.  The whole nine yards.

Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money.

But that’s not easy, and we may not have much time.

In fact, if gun owners are going to defeat the UN Small Arms Treaty pro-gun Americans like you and me have to get involved NOW!

So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN Small Arms Treaty by signing NAGR’s Firearms Sovereignty Survey.

But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights.

For Freedom,

Rand Paul
United States Senator

P.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced the Obama Administration will be working hand in glove with the United Nations to pass a new GLOBAL, “Small Arms Treaty.”

If we’re going to defeat the UN Small Arms Treaty gun owners have to turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it’s too late!

Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST ratification of the UN Small Arms Treaty.

And if you can, please make a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights of $250, $150, $100 or even just $35 right away!

And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

I got the above email from "Rand Paul".   Anybody know if the concerns posted above are legit?   I wouldn't put anything past our rat fink of a President.

That's been posted on here a few times. I can't remember if it was anything to worry about or not, but I don't think it was.

Yes, the U.N. treaty desires are real. 

I think there would be a hell of a fight in the Senate over ratifying it though, so I am not betting on the U.S. ever signing off on this one.

Although the United Nations has been studying the feasibility of effecting an arms trade treaty the above referenced piece of scarelore about the U.

Although the United Nations has been studying the feasiblity of effecting an arms trade treaty the above referenced piece of scarelore about the U.S. having already entered into such a treaty -one which supposedly provides a "legal" way around the 2nd amendment and will result in a ban on all weapons for U.S. Citizens is erroneous in all it's particulars. -Snopes~

fishmahn Said:
Although the United Nations has been studying the feasiblity of effecting an arms trade treaty the above referenced piece of scarelore about the U.S. having already entered into such a treaty -one which supposedly provides a "legal" way around the 2nd amendment and will result in a ban on all weapons for U.S. Citizens is erroneous in all it's particulars. -Snopes~

Spoken by the paid DNC shill!!!!!!!!!!! Nothing he says regarding this should be taken seriously!

 

3XGutshot Said:
I got the above email from "Rand Paul".   Anybody know if the concerns posted above are legit?   I wouldn't put anything past our rat fink of a President.

It takes 67 Senators to ratify.  The votes are just simply not there right now.

FWIW Clinton tried to ram this through as well to no avail.

Hardwaterman-It's difficult to discuss anything with you as "facts" seem to run contrary to your way of thinking. There really shouldn't be any conflict here. You do have the capacity to go to a library or your home , pull the shades, look both ways to make sure no one sees you and actually look up the facts.

 I think the piece of this one needs to stay vigilant about is to make certain it stands on it's own and doesn't get attached to some other piece of legislation as an unread footnote.

"There is no legal way around the  2nd amendment other than a further amendment to the constitution that repeals or alters it, or a supreme court decision that radically reinterprets how the 2nd amendment is to be applied."

 

fishmahn Said:
"There is no legal way around the  2nd amendment other than a further amendment to the constitution that repeals or alters it, or a supreme court decision that radically reinterprets how the 2nd amendment is to be applied."

Agreed, as it applies to US lawmakers and law enforcement.  However, the dudes in blue helmets couldn't possibly care less about a piece of paper in a dimly lit room under thick green glass.

The SNOPES reference by FISHMAHN is from May 2010.  Is there something new in the works that hasn't hit SNOPES yet?   Hopefully, they can't find a way around Senate ratification because you can't trust this administration.

Find a way around? Change the constitution maybe but I think we might pick up on that.

fishmahn Said:
"There is no legal way around the  2nd amendment other than a further amendment to the constitution that repeals or alters it, or a supreme court decision that radically reinterprets how the 2nd amendment is to be applied."

Tell that to Hitler...
Strongarmed  the Germans after he became Chancellor to dissolve the constitution, and run everything thru him...
 Right now, I have 0 trust for the United States government, or the President.
Two things im investing in these days. Food and Lead.

jokostel Said:

fishmahn Said:
"There is no legal way around the  2nd amendment other than a further amendment to the constitution that repeals or alters it, or a supreme court decision that radically reinterprets how the 2nd amendment is to be applied."

Tell that to Hitler...
Strongarmed  the Germans after he became Chancellor to dissolve the constitution, and run everything thru him...
 Right now, I have 0 trust for the United States government, or the President.
Two things im investing in these days. Food and Lead.

That is 100% correct  

hmm,, Hitler and Nazism? Nazism incorporates antisemitism and biological racism. It was founded out of far right and left wing ideologies though more scholars identify it as a far right form of politics. Are you guys inferring the Tea party is trying to take away American citizens guns???

fishmahn Said:
hmm,, Hitler and Nazism? Nazism incorporates antisemitism and biological racism. It was founded out of far right and left wing ideologies though more scholars identify it as a far right form of politics. Are you guys inferring the Tea party is trying to take away American citizens guns???

? yeah thats right, the right wingers are racist arent they...

The Senate must vote on all UN treaty resolutions.  Then the President can sign any resolution into law (as long as it does not conflict with the US constitutional laws.)  The
house of reps does not vote on these treaties.  I suppose the bill could be passed and put into effect the the long drawn out process of the Supreme court deciding if it violates any laws would be the next step. In any case, the UN should look to a lot more serious criminal activities elsewhere.  As far as Mexico gun trading, seems to me that a lot of the cartels guns are M16A1, A2 and M203 's  .  These are probably surplus arms the US has given to Central and South american countries of questionable control and the arms have been pilffered to the cartel.  Maybe the Government should look to its Military arms deals before deciding to strip the public.

john r- If you say so...

fishmahn Said:
john r- If you say so...

Thats what I am saying. they are also responsible for our current situation, and all future situations also. The federal budget that hasnt been for the last 2.5 yrs....right wingers fault too. Obamas 36% approval rating...you guessed it. down grade of our credit rating thats them, 911 them too,  record unemployment...yup its still Bushes fault and the right wingers.

Feel free to add to it, I know I missed a ton of others