Homeland Security purchases 2700 light armored tanks

Pages

73 posts / 0 new
Last post
cynical's picture
cynical
Online
Joined: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:00am
Homeland Security purchases 2700 light armored tanks

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile

Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, March 3, 2013, 9:55 PM

 
 

This is getting a little creepy.
According to one estimate, since last year the Department of Homeland Security has stockpiled more than 1.6 billion bullets, mainly .40 caliber and 9mm.

DHS also purchased 2,700 Mine Resistant Armor Protected Vehicles (MRAP).
homeland security mrap

Modern Survival Blog reported:

The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States.

Although I’ve seen and read several online blurbs about this vehicle of late, I decided to dig slightly deeper and discover more about the vehicle itself.

The new DHS sanctioned ‘Street Sweeper’ (my own slang due to the gun ports) is built by Navistar Defense (NavistarDefense.com), a division within the Navistar organization. Under the Navistar umbrella are several other companies including International Trucks, IC Bus (they make school buses), Monaco RV (recreational vehicles), WorkHorse (they make chassis), MaxxForce (diesel engines), and Navistar Financial (the money arm of the company).

DHS even released a video on their newly purchased MRAPs.
Via Pat Dollard:

The MRAP featured in this video is was in Albuquerque, New Mexico for Law Enforcement Day which was held at a local area Target Store. This MRAP is stationed in El Paso, Texas at The Homeland Security Investigations Office. MRAP is a Mine Resistant Armor Protected Vehicle.

cynical's picture
cynical
Online
Joined: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:00am

What are the odds they will use these tanks to help seal off our border with Old Mexico?

"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
 -Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

Lane
Offline
Joined: Saturday, April 20, 2002 - 12:00am

They wont be used on the border,or do they think we will be invaded?my thoughts are ,they might be used to confiscate our guns and ammo

ggenthusiast's picture
ggenthusiast
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 - 12:00am

you can guatantee the onstar gps on these shows an icon at the address of every known gun owner in America.  my guess is yhe icon looks like a red flag, or possibly a skull and crossbones.

I say to hell with that pot o' gold.

johnr's picture
johnr
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 - 12:00am

Who authorizes these types of purchases? Do our congressmen have to sign off on this stuff, or is some appointed Zar able to just spend our money on anything the regime lets them

There's a whole generation of Americans that have no idea about the truth of the Clintons, particularly Hillary 


jmidjet's picture
jmidjet
Offline
Joined: Friday, June 17, 2011 - 8:10pm

Lane Said:
They wont be used on the border,or do they think we will be invaded?my thoughts are ,they might be used to confiscate our guns and ammo

That's what I was thinking.  Don't think average citizens stand a chance against these.

cynical's picture
cynical
Online
Joined: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:00am

johnr Said:
Who authorizes these types of purchases? Do our congressmen have to sign off on this stuff, or is some appointed Czar able to just spend our money on anything the regime lets them

Good question.  I emailed our fearless leaders in Washington, DC asking who has authorized all these Homeland Security purchases like the big ammo purchases etc. and haven't heard a damn thing back from any of them.

"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
 -Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

Kentucky Windage
Offline
Joined: Friday, May 6, 2011 - 10:27am

Scheels sells RPG's right?

 

Meatball
Offline
Joined: Thursday, March 8, 2012 - 2:02pm

Molotov Cocktails.

WellArmed's picture
WellArmed
Offline
Joined: Monday, March 9, 2009 - 6:51pm

Get ready for an all out fight.

If you were a badminton ace, I think this would be a good bumper sticker:  "Suck my Shuttlecock" 

 

 

 

ggenthusiast's picture
ggenthusiast
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 - 12:00am

the 2nd amendment at least gives us the power to aquire one for ourselves when they do decide to strip us all of our rights.

I say to hell with that pot o' gold.

z
Offline
Joined: Tuesday, April 3, 2007 - 10:38am

I would have to guess that they are preparing for an all out assault on US citizens.
I see no other valid reason the Homeland security should have these.  The guard and reserves would be the most logical choice(for pre deployment training).
These things can be taken out.  It just takes some preplanning. 
At this time, the only thing I can think of is they acquired them because the Executive branch is planning something down the road.  This really looks bad.  But hey, dont worry, the government will see to our every need.

eyexer's picture
eyexer
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 4:42pm

cynical Said:
What are the odds they will use these tanks to help seal off our border with Old Mexico?

about zero.  they'll use them to escort the illegals in to gain their amnesty

 

eyexer's picture
eyexer
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 4:42pm

I wonder how hard it would be to acquire rpg's or bazooka's or things of this nature.  I would think a person could get our hands on this kind of stuff if we look hard enough.  I"m afraid that's what it's going to take.

 

WellArmed's picture
WellArmed
Offline
Joined: Monday, March 9, 2009 - 6:51pm

"Now I ‘d like to disperse a myth here – many of you think that US military would not fight civilians. I can’t speak for all, but in my case – the moment you declare civil war, you’re no longer civilians. "

taken from here:

http://blogs.alternet.org/grantlawrence/2010/03/27/us-marine-i-will-figh...
 

If you were a badminton ace, I think this would be a good bumper sticker:  "Suck my Shuttlecock" 

 

 

 

MossyMO's picture
MossyMO
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 - 12:00am

I cannot see military or police members following orders to use these against fellow American law abiding citizens... even if our great leader changes the laws; I think they would have to be manned with anti-American personnel.

4570killer's picture
4570killer
Offline
Joined: Thursday, January 24, 2013 - 2:41pm

 these are scary and uncertain times we live in,

Ya cant grill it Till ya kill it

johnr's picture
johnr
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 - 12:00am

MossyMO Said:

 

I cannot see military or police members following orders to use these against fellow American law abiding citizens... even if our great leader changes the laws; I think they would have to be manned with anti-American personnel.


More commonly called liberals.....

There's a whole generation of Americans that have no idea about the truth of the Clintons, particularly Hillary 


Alpine's picture
Alpine
Offline
Joined: Friday, January 13, 2012 - 11:26am

I have spent a goodly portion of my life in uniform.  I have many friends still serving in uniform.  They (and many more) agree that they will follow orders, but only lawful orders.  Orders based on the Constitution they have agreed to protect.

IF it comes to it, I look for much of the military to lay down their weapons or turn them on the facists who attack the citizen and the Constitution.  If they want a civil war, well then let's give it to them.

 

mowerman's picture
mowerman
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 - 8:09pm

Thanks Alpine!!!!!!!!!!!

guywhofishes's picture
guywhofishes
Offline
Joined: Friday, May 4, 2007 - 7:41am

They may need them when austerity measures finally are taken. The freeloaders are going to go absolutely ape-crap. It's not a matter of if but when.



z
Offline
Joined: Tuesday, April 3, 2007 - 10:38am

If you use enough demo, they to can fly.

MissedAgain
Offline
Joined: Friday, September 22, 2006 - 10:18am
So could this be preparation to sometime in the future provide them with enough assets so that they could go around and confiscate weapons, after they have had them registered?

 


Kaptain's picture
Kaptain
Offline
Joined: Monday, November 6, 2006 - 9:56pm

Donate now!

 

jmidjet's picture
jmidjet
Offline
Joined: Friday, June 17, 2011 - 8:10pm

Remember Kent State?  It happened before and it could happen again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

BrokenBackJack's picture
BrokenBackJack
Offline
Joined: Monday, February 11, 2002 - 12:00am

Alpine Said:
I have spent a goodly portion of my life in uniform.  I have many friends still serving in uniform.  They (and many more) agree that they will follow orders, but only lawful orders.  Orders based on the Constitution they have agreed to protect.

IF it comes to it, I look for much of the military to lay down their weapons or turn them on the facists who attack the citizen and the Constitution.  If they want a civil war, well then let's give it to them.

I sure hope you're right but i highly doubt they won't follow orders.
Sure hope i am wrong on this!!!!

Johnny 7

Cowbell's picture
Cowbell
Offline
Joined: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 - 12:00pm

I agree that regular soldiers probably won't fire on friends and neighbors. BUT, when soldiers from the south are sent north and soldiers from the north are sent south, they aren't fighting friends and neighbors anymore.

sickofthesmoke
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 - 7:38pm

If they do go up against the US legal gun owners they will know what its like to be in the SUCK

sickofthesmoke
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 - 7:38pm

Sometimes wonder if the only way to fit these idiots anymore is to let the fruit rot on the vine.

buckrub's picture
buckrub
Offline
Joined: Sunday, December 24, 2006 - 10:19am

Kentucky Windage Said:
Scheels sells RPG's right?

RPG's?  Heck the don't even sell rifle ammo anymore!!

Meatball
Offline
Joined: Thursday, March 8, 2012 - 2:02pm

  History lesson, The Nazis gave power to the some Jews and they rounded up their OWN PEOPLE, from their neigherborhood. If they give power, security, and peace of mind to police or military you would be surprise how many would turn against us.

   Hate to say it but history has shown how power can influence the weak, russia cambodia, germany.

cynical's picture
cynical
Online
Joined: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 - 12:00am

Meatball Said:
  History lesson, The Nazis gave power to the some Jews and they rounded up their OWN PEOPLE, from their neigherborhood. If they give power, security, and peace of mind to police or military you would be surprise how many would turn against us.

   Hate to say it but history has shown how power can influence the weak, russia cambodia, germany.

Exactly.  When faced with being jailed for not following orders and their family with no income what do you suppose many of then would do?

"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."
 -Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
-Thomas Jefferson

 

 

ggenthusiast's picture
ggenthusiast
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 - 12:00am

What baffles me is how someone cannot understand that the 2nd amendment clearly wants the people to be armed as well as anyone they may have to face in battle.  thats why its worded "arms", not keep and bear "muskets". 

Our leaders are constantly touting that there is "no need" for a civilian to have a military-type firearm. 

Can't they read?

I say to hell with that pot o' gold.

Goosefishmen's picture
Goosefishmen
Offline
Joined: Thursday, May 7, 2009 - 11:32am

Desiel fuel and fertilizer...........

There is no limit on a Good Time!!

Alpine's picture
Alpine
Offline
Joined: Friday, January 13, 2012 - 11:26am

"Can't they read?"

They would say -- "You are reading from the old outdated order, not the new order.  Can't YOU read?"

 

ggenthusiast's picture
ggenthusiast
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 - 12:00am

Alpine Said:
"Can't they read?"

They would say -- "You are reading from the old outdated order, not the new order.  Can't YOU read?"

Agree, but that still baffles me too.  As there is not an expiration date on the bill of rights, they should be trying to simply repeal the 2nd ammendment.  Go through the proper channels if they want to "update" the constitution.  If it passes, then it will be law.  Until then, these gun bans are unconstitional.

I say to hell with that pot o' gold.

johnr's picture
johnr
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 - 12:00am

ggenthusiast Said:

Alpine Said:
"Can't they read?"

They would say -- "You are reading from the old outdated order, not the new order.  Can't YOU read?"

Agree, but that still baffles me too.  As there is not an expiration date on the bill of rights, they should be trying to simply repeal the 2nd ammendment.  Go through the proper channels if they want to "update" the constitution.  If it passes, then it will be law.  Until then, these gun bans are unconstitional.

There's a whole generation of Americans that have no idea about the truth of the Clintons, particularly Hillary 


bobkat's picture
bobkat
Offline
Joined: Sunday, December 16, 2001 - 12:00am

I might have missed this, but I can't find a single thing about this on any News Service, FOX, CNN, NPR, or any others.   I'd think this would be a HUGE News Story  and talking heads story for all the networks,for any News service!!??!! 
Being mainly flat on my back in pain for the past couple weeks i have lots of time to look up stuff, but maybe my eyesoight is bad. Maybe i don't read well holding the eyepad above me? 
Anybody have links?  I could be wrong or blind, and am sure not calling it hype, but I sure can't find anything about this?? 

cootkiller 1's picture
cootkiller 1
Offline
Joined: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 - 12:00am

 Do a minimal amount of fact checking and you will realize how absurd this headline is.  Type that headline into google and check our littlegreenfootballs fact checking site.  Don't believe everything you read on the internet, if you do then I am a french model, cripes.

cootkiller

 

bobkat's picture
bobkat
Offline
Joined: Sunday, December 16, 2001 - 12:00am

 Oops!  Fresh off the press!  Turns outitwas started by an Internet Hoax site "drudge.com"  and when googled it was only passes on by a bunch of right wing nut Redneck type websites.a whole list of them, but not a single News service! LOL
I Couldn,t understand why every news network wouldn't,t be all over this like flies on feces! 
As written it would have been a bigger story even than Watergate or worse.
Not to rain on anyon,s parade, but its always scary how people who should know better and should think about some of this kind of nonsense actually believe this stuff and buy right into it. My email box fills with this stuff every day.  
the magic if Internet pot stirring I guess, not that there isn't,t all kind of legitimate stuff that needs attention brought to it!   Instead we concentrate on junk like birth certificates and this stuff.
Off Topic but like Jindal  says "letsstopbeing the stupid party!"  Let's starttobuild our credibility back where it's 20 - 30 years ago.  Or do we really want Hillary or even worse if possible, Biden  as pres??  
I apologies to anyone imoghthave offended, but same old, same old - it never changes..

bobkat's picture
bobkat
Offline
Joined: Sunday, December 16, 2001 - 12:00am

 Oops!  Fresh off the press!  Turns outitwas started by an Internet Hoax site "drudge.com"  and when googled it was only passes on by a bunch of right wing nut Redneck type websites.a whole list of them, but not a single News service! LOL
I Couldn,t understand why every news network wouldn't,t be all over this like flies on feces! 
As written it would have been a bigger story even than Watergate or worse.
Not to rain on anyon,s parade, but its always scary how people who should know better and should think about some of this kind of nonsense actually believe this stuff and buy right into it. My email box fills with this stuff every day.  
the magic if Internet pot stirring I guess, not that there isn't,t all kind of legitimate stuff that needs attention brought to it!   Instead we concentrate on junk like birth certificates and this stuff.
Off Topic but like Jindal  says "letsstopbeing the stupid party!"  Let's starttobuild our credibility back where it's 20 - 30 years ago.  Or do we really want Hillary or even worse if possible, Biden  as pres??  
I apologies to anyone imoghthave offended, but same old, same old - it never changes..

Wags86's picture
Wags86
Offline
Joined: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - 6:05pm

cootkiller 1 Said:
 Do a minimal amount of fact checking and you will realize how absurd this headline is.  Type that headline into google and check our littlegreenfootballs fact checking site.  Don't believe everything you read on the internet, if you do then I am a french model, cripes.

cootkiller

Bonjour cootkiller

 

 "I get what you're saying:  Like a sausage replica featuring a Polander holding a sacred illumination device." 

 

svnmag's picture
svnmag
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 3, 2002 - 12:00am

What wine do you recommend with horse meat?

 Nuke the Whales

svnmag's picture
svnmag
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 3, 2002 - 12:00am

How does Bath & Bodyworks compare with the hidden boutiques in Paris?

 Nuke the Whales

eatsleephunt's picture
eatsleephunt
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 12, 2006 - 9:36am

Any merlot. I make it in the toilet.

golfer
Offline
Joined: Friday, February 15, 2002 - 12:00am

cootkiller 1 Said:
 Do a minimal amount of fact checking and you will realize how absurd this headline is.  Type that headline into google and check our littlegreenfootballs fact checking site.  Don't believe everything you read on the internet, if you do then I am a french model, cripes.

cootkiller

Wow that sucks.  Every time i go bury my guns in the backyard I find out that some of these posts are false.  Better go dig them up again.  My backyard looks terrible with all the holes.

svnmag's picture
svnmag
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 3, 2002 - 12:00am

False like your breasts?

 Nuke the Whales

golfer
Offline
Joined: Friday, February 15, 2002 - 12:00am

svnmag Said:
False like your breasts?

That hurts, you told me you liked them they way they are.  The shaving hint was a good one though.

svnmag's picture
svnmag
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 3, 2002 - 12:00am

I have never told you that.

 Nuke the Whales

golfer
Offline
Joined: Friday, February 15, 2002 - 12:00am

svnmag Said:
I have never told you that.

CHEATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

svnmag's picture
svnmag
Offline
Joined: Sunday, November 3, 2002 - 12:00am

On a serious note, why would this story be false after the un-false ammo purchases? 

Your breasts are fine, just stop feeding animals.

 Nuke the Whales

Pages