Hunting Fishing Discussions

Featured Outdoor Businesses



Share on Facebook subscribe feed

Exxon Mobil

Permalink: Exxon Mobil
by , Posted to on 02/01/2007 12:50 PM | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/28/2005
Location: ND
Exxon Mobil posts record annual profit By JOHN PORRETTO, AP Business Writer
39 minutes ago



HOUSTON - Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. on Thursday posted the largest annual profit by a U.S. company ? $39.5 billion ? even as earnings for the last quarter of 2006 declined 4 percent.

The 2006 profit topped the previous record, also by Exxon Mobil, of $36.13 billion set in 2005. The record earnings amounted to roughly $4.5 million an hour for the world's largest publicly traded oil company, which produces about 3 percent of the world's oil.

It also equals the approximate gross domestic product ? a measure of all goods and services produced within a country in a given year ? of countries like Ecuador, Luxembourg and Croatia.

Also eyepopping was Exxon Mobil's revenue, which rose to $377.64 billion for the year, surpassing the record $370.68 billion it posted in 2005.

"Exxon Mobil continued to leverage its globally diverse resource base to bring additional crude oil and natural gas to market," said Rex W. Tillerson, chairman of the Irving, Texas-based company.

Still, it marked the first time since the third quarter of 2002 Exxon Mobil had a year-over-year quarterly earnings decline.

Exxon Mobil's record annual earnings followed a year of extraordinarily high energy prices as crude oil topped $78 a barrel in the summer ? driving up average gasoline prices in the United States to more than $3 a gallon. Prices retreated later in the year.

The fourth-quarter decline reflects lower profits from Exxon's refining and marketing operations and a sharp dropoff in natural gas prices.

The company said earnings from exploration and production were $6.2 billion for the quarter, down from about $7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2005. Earnings also fell on the refining and marketing side to $1.96 billion in the most recent quarter from $2.4 billion a year ago.

Oil production for the quarter was up slightly from a year ago, while natural gas production was off slightly.

The company said it ended 2006 with $32.8 billion in cash, and debt of $8.3 billion. Tillerson and other company executives plan to meet with Wall Street analysts March 7 to discuss ongoing business plans.

Exxon Mobil's results for the October-December period mimicked those of U.S. competitor ConocoPhillips, which last week said its fourth-quarter profit fell 13 percent ? also primarily because of lower natural gas prices and refining margins. But hefty earnings earlier in the year helped Houston-based ConocoPhillips post its most profitable year on record, earning $15.55 billion.

ConocoPhillips is the nation's third-largest integrated oil company behind Exxon Mobil and Chevron Corp., which is scheduled to report 2006 results Friday.

Also Thursday, Royal Dutch Shell PLC reported a 21 percent rise in fourth-quarter earnings, buoyed in part by high energy prices and the sale of some operations. Net profit came to $5.28 billion, up from $4.37 billion. But excluding divestitures and other one-time items, Shell's earnings from oil production fell 3 percent, while fourth-quarter sales were flat at $75.5 billion.

The Anglo-Dutch company also said it had taken important steps to bulk up its proven reserves, which were revealed to have been inflated in a 2004 accounting scandal.

At Exxon Mobil, profit for the fourth quarter of 2006 declined to $10.25 billion from the $10.71 billion Exxon earned in the 2005 quarter ? a record quarterly profit for any U.S. public company. That best-ever profit came when the price of both natural gas and crude oil skyrocketed in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which damaged wells, pipelines and refineries in the key energy-producing Gulf of Mexico.

Analysts largely have predicted declines in fourth-quarter earnings for the big U.S. oil companies because of the moderation in prices.

Exxon Mobil's per-share earnings in the fourth quarter rose to $1.76 from $1.71 as the company reduced the number of shares outstanding. Wall Street analysts polled by Thomson Financial had forecast earnings of $1.51 a share.

Excluding special items, Exxon Mobil earned $9.84 billion, or $1.69 a share, in the final three months of 2006.

Quarterly revenue fell to $90 billion from $99 billion in the year-ago period.

For the year, Exxon earned $6.62 per share in 2006 versus $5.71 per share in 2005.

Exxon shares rose 47 cents to $74.57 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange. They have traded in a 52-week range of $56.64 to $79.

___

AP Business Writer Lauren Villagran in New York and Associated Press Writer Toby Sterling in Amsterdam, Netherlands contributed to this report.

There's no bag limit on happiness.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 12:51 PM | Reply #1 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/28/2005
Location: ND
No wonder they don't want Gas prices down!!
There's no bag limit on happiness.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 12:58 PM | Reply #2 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/16/2006
Location: ND
what a shame. 39.5 billion PROFFIT. they must feel like they are strugling. Iam in the wrong business i see.
Randy Nelson
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:21 PM | Reply #3 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 09/28/2006
Location: ND
Good for them. What great news for our economy and markets. I just hope the mutual fund managers in my 401k bought some shares:)
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:27 PM | Reply #4 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
for those of you who think this is bad and hate big oil you need to realize the world population is growing, oil demand is growing so of course oil companies will continue to make more and more profit until the demoncats get their way and tax them to death. If $39.5 billion is too much what is the profit amount you think would be reasonable in your mind? From above Exxon-Mobil only produces 3% of the worlds oil.
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:30 PM | Reply #5 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/16/2001
Location: ND
That's nothing. I read on the Bismarck Tribune's site that the oil producers are trying to get the Legislature to give them tax breaks on new drilling because it's so expensive. I guess they aren't making enough.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:34 PM | Reply #6 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 07/14/2003
Location: ND
gonefshn,

Did you read the "rest of the story".  ND oil goes for about 35 to 45 bucks a barrel and it's usually at 35.  That has been stable for ever.  The cost to drill varies from 4 to 6 million.  Then the taxes hit them.  If we want business development in this state and people to quit moving we need to stop taxing so damn much!

Tim Sandstrom




 
Kirsch's Outdoor Products | Fargo, ND | 701-261-9017 koutdoorproducts.com
Risovi Taxidermy Studio | New Rockford, ND | 701-947-2048 risovitaxidermystudio.com
Jig-em-Up Guide Service | Grand Forks, ND | 701-739-9198 jig-em-up-guide-service.com

 
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:40 PM | Reply #7 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
gonefshn, do you understand oil exploration in ND? Giving them a tax break is helpfull in getting them to drill in ND rather than putting their money into other areas with better tax rates or better prospects like MT, the gulf, Canada etc. The average cost of drilling an oil well today in the hot bakken formation is about 6 million. Not all wells produce and not all wells are drilled by big oil companies. It can take many years to produce enough to pay for their investment. A tax break for oil companies can be argued as an investment in ND with the potential for increased tax revenue. No different than a city like Fargo or Bismarck increasing our sales tax to fund a renaissance project. We can all benefit by maximizing domestic oil production.
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:47 PM | Reply #8 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/14/2006
Location: ND
why give them a tax break the state has the oil its not going anywhere and the oil companys cant drill enough holes north dakota needs to get it while they can giving a tax break during a boom would be crazy
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:52 PM | Reply #9 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
are you kidding me? why not incentivize drilling now rather than wait till later? If you understand the time value of money you would take the money now rather than later.
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:59 PM | Reply #10 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
c4miles34, why not increase the tax rates 10%, 20% and why not 30% and see what happens.
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 1:59 PM | Reply #11 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/21/2006
Location: ND
I wouldn't give any tax cuts.
If drilling for oil wasn't profitable they wouldn't be doing it. Theres alot plenty of money being spent right now on exploration in ND also. I know some survey/engineering firms that haven't slowed down in 2 years from all the work.

Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 2:15 PM | Reply #12 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 07/13/2003
Location: ND
Why give oil companies tax breaks? We should be giving tax breaks to the auto makers to come up with more fuel efficient or alternative fuel vehicles. Didn't our good president say we need to ween ourselves off oil?
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 2:20 PM | Reply #13 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/14/2006
Location: ND
To be honest with you I dont beleive a 10% increase in taxes would slow them down but I know a 10% decrease wouldnt bring one more rig into the state the bakken is a very difficult formataion to tap and yes nd crude is worth less than west texas sweet crude because of quality and infrastructure but new rigs and old rigs are moving into north dakota not out Marathon oil moved into dickinson north dakota not sidney montana if you want to give them subsidies for gouging at the pump take the taxes from the wells and subsidies a refinery expansion in mandan to increase value and create stable jobs in north dakota but dont give a tax break to an expanding and booming oil field.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 3:54 PM | Reply #14 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
Should we tax the heck out of seed companies like Monsanto and Pioneer since they make too much profit. I doubt that would help the average farmer.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070123/bs_nm/dupont_results_dc
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:10 PM | Reply #15 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/14/2006
Location: ND
anybody else wondering what monsanto or pioneer have to do with dupont??? Or more importantly what they have to do with fair taxation of oil companies
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:16 PM | Reply #16 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
Pioneer Seed is owned by DuPont. Trying to make a point that if you tax a business or business sector it just gets passed on to the consumer.
The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians.
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:19 PM | Reply #17 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/16/2006
Location: ND
c-mon guys . why must you try and fight with me? where did i say it was too much? i said they must be stuggling. man what i could do with 39 billion proffit. kinda a bit of sarcasm .
i have no feeling to this topic, i was just stating that it must be ruff to have such a high proffit and then you 2 have to get after me on it . i wish i could be on the winning side of 39 billion, i wouldnt have to worry how to get my kids threw school then.
Randy Nelson
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:23 PM | Reply #18 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/14/2006
Location: ND
so you beleive a tax break to oil the oil companies would result in lower prices at the pump
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:47 PM | Reply #19 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 08/12/2003
Location: ND
C4miles34 wrote:

"so you beleive a tax break to oil the oil companies would result in lower prices at the pump".

Nope, but a tax increase will equate to higher prices at the pump.

A small company doing exploration/development in the Williston basin for oil, and some in WY for natural gas had a stock price of $2.11 at this time last year. It was $4.60
today. Lotsa money to be made out there.
..............THIS SPACE FOR RENT..............
Re: Exxon Mobil
by on 02/01/2007 4:56 PM | Reply #20 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/24/2003
Location: ND

You guys are funny.

It is like Ed and Rush going at here on FBO.

Here are the facts people. We have no-one to blame but ourselves. Record profits and we still continue to buy gas and buy vehicles that use gas. Most of the CEO's that have been confronted have already said it to our faces and yet we continue to buy big SUV's for our soccer moms.

I used to be one of them. Wife was in a suburban and I had to have my pickup. Now we are down to one car and the suburban. Our next purchase will be another gas saving car and the suburban will only be used when neccessary.

Until the rest of America wakes up and figures out what they really need or what they can get by with, these oil companies will put their price on the pumps at any price they choose.

If you really expect politicians to come to your aid you can pray all you want. Top major oil companies gave over $7,000,000 to the Republican war chest. Democrats will tax them and use it to pay welfare. None of us will benefit.

Take a Kid Hunting instead of hunting for your kid.

Posted By:
Posted On: 02/01/2007 12:50 PM
1521 Views, 32 Comments

Tags: exxon, mobil, billion, oil, company, profit, record, u.s, annual, business
More Tags: USD, Exxon Mobil Corp., Earnings Announcement, United States, ConocoPhillips, crude oil, HOUSTON, high energy prices, natural gas, Oil production, oil, Rex W. Tillerson, Amsterdam, Irving, Luxembourg, New York, Thomson Financial, Associated Press, New York Stock Exchange, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Chevron Corp., Ecuador, The Netherlands, Croatia, Luxembourg, cent, Wall Street, key energy-producing, traded oil, lower natural gas prices, approximate gross domestic product, natural gas production, natural gas prices, integrated oil, Gulf of Mexico, Toby Sterling, JOHN PORRETTO, Lauren Villagran, Texas, Gulf of Mexico, Person Communication and Meetings, Business_Finance
Region: Minnesota

Categories: Other > Other Off-Topic
Rate This ForumTopic
  • Currently 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

0/5 (0 votes cast)

You must be signed in to comment on this topic