Hunting Fishing Discussions

Featured Outdoor Businesses

Dickinson CVB
Dickinson, ND


Share on Facebook subscribe feed
9 Replies | Page 1 of 11 | Top of Page | Bottom of Page

another reason not to buy GM

by , Posted to on 06/07/2011 09:57 AM | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/27/2004
Location: ND
Last Updated: June 07. 2011 6:17AM

GM chief pushing for higher gas taxes

David Shepardson and Christina Rogers/ The Detroit News

Detroit — General Motors Co. CEO Dan Akerson wants the federal gas tax boosted as much as $1 a gallon to nudge consumers toward more fuel-efficient cars, and he's confident the government will soon shed its remaining 26 percent stake in the once-bankrupt automaker.

"I actually think the government will be out this year — within the next 12 months, hopefully within the next six months," Akerson said in a two-hour interview with The Detroit News last week.

He is grateful for the government's rescue of GM — "I have nothing but good things to say about them" — but Akerson said the time for that relationship to end is coming because it's wearing on GM.

"It's kind of like your in-laws: It was a nice long weekend. We didn't say a week," Akerson said with a laugh.

And while he is eager to say goodbye to the government as a part owner of GM, Akerson would like to see it step up to the challenge of setting a higher gas tax, as part of a comprehensive energy policy.

A government-imposed tax hike, Akerson believes, will prompt more people to buy small cars and do more good for the environment than forcing automakers to comply with higher gas-mileage standards.

"There ought to be a discussion on the cost versus the benefits," he said. "What we are going to do is tax production here, and that will cost us jobs."

For the years 2017-25, federal officials are considering 3 percent to 6 percent annual fuel efficiency increases, or 47 mpg to 62 mpg. That could boost the cost of vehicles by up to $3,500.

"You know what I'd rather have them do — this will make my Republican friends puke — as gas is going to go down here now, we ought to just slap a 50-cent or a dollar tax on a gallon of gas," Akerson said.

"People will start buying more Cruzes and they will start buying less Suburbans."

With gas already over $4 a gallon in parts of the country, a higher gas tax is a hard sell.

Rebecca Lindland, an analyst with IHS Global Insight, said higher gas taxes in Europe did lead consumers to buy more fuel-efficient cars.

But she acknowledged that's virtually impossible to see in the United States.

"It's career suicide for a politician to call for raising gas taxes," Lindland said.

Akerson isn't the first auto exec to float the idea of a gas tax to encourage consumers to buy fuel-efficient vehicles. Ford Chairman Bill Ford Jr. has previously advocated a gas tax increase.

On Monday, a Ford spokeswoman said the company "will leave the policy decision to Congress"; in 2009, GM CEO Rick Wagoner called a higher gas tax "worthy of consideration."

Stock boost sought

Akerson believes the Treasury's continued ownership stake in GM — 500 million shares — is dragging down its stock price, which has fallen 23 percent this year, and closed Monday at $28.56. That's well below the $33-per-share it fetched in November's $23 billion initial public stock offering.

"I think that it is an overhang — to have 500 million shares sitting out there — it's a problem," Akerson said, adding that unrest in the Middle East and oil prices also are depressing GM's share price. "They don't know when (the Treasury is) going to come out. Investors hate uncertainty."

David Whiston, an auto analyst at Morningstar, agrees that government ownership is impacting investors' interest in GM.

"There are a lot of money managers that are waiting for the government to exit before jumping in," Whiston said.

The Treasury, which rescued GM with a $49.5 billion bailout and once held a 61 percent majority stake, "will likely look at another (stock) sale in August, after second-quarter earnings are announced, Akerson said.

The Obama administration has made clear it is eager to exit GM — but hasn't laid out a precise timetable.

Asked if GM is considering buying back its stock, Akerson paused for eight seconds before declining to answer directly. "But we have a lot of cash," he added.

At the current stock price, U.S. taxpayers would be out more than $12 billion on GM's bailout. Still, Akerson believes that, in the end, taxpayers will see the government made the right call in saving the automaker, as well as crosstown rival Chrysler.

"We are in the midst of transforming an iconic American company so 20 and 30 years from now (taxpayers) will look at this company and they'll say, 'Absolutely it was the right thing to do,'" Akerson said. "And it shouldn't be measured on did it sell for $43 or $53 (a share) or did they lose a couple billion dollars?"

GM was saved, he said, because of the extreme generosity of Americans — a spirit that helped restore Europe and Japan after World War II and rebuild cities such as New Orleans after natural disasters.

"We're the most generous country, even in terrible times," Akerson said. "We don't walk to the disaster as a nation. … We can't wait to help."

Things are looking up for GM's image, he said. Pollster Peter Hart, conducting research for GM, found 16 percent had a positive view of GM before the bailout. But that had risen to 65 percent early this year, Akerson said.

"I couldn't believe the press we got on the IPO — it was like a $100 million gift," Akerson said.

GM's rebound, he believes, was a "proxy" for the U.S.

"OK, we took the blow as a nation, we weathered the worst, and my God, we're back," Akerson said. "It's why I came here. It was a story of underdog that tripped as we all have in our lives — it was a good feel-good story."

Call for tax hikes

In his interview with The News, Akerson also weighed in on the nation's debt ceiling, saying Congress should raise it from its current $14.3 trillion mark. The government could default on its debt on Aug. 2.

"We're too good a nation to let ourselves be a banana republic," Akerson said, warning that a default would be "unimaginable" and could hurt auto sales.

But he agrees with those who say the country has been spending money it can't afford.

"Now, we need practical decisions," Akerson said. "I think you need to cut the hell out of the budget and you've got to increase taxes … on everybody — including the middle class and the rich people."

Akerson, who describes himself as "a Colin Powell Republican — not a Sarah Palin Republican" — said President Barack Obama has "done a pretty good job on the economy," which, he said, was "a nightmare.

"I don't think he can fix it in four years and I think we just have to stay the course," he said.

Despite his Republican stripes, Akerson is frustrated with the political climate and the media.

He was invited to appear on CBS' "Face the Nation," but said: "I can't go on it. I'm toxic. I'm like a lightning rod. I couldn't have an intelligent discussion without someone saying, 'He's a welfare guy from the bailout.'"

But he noted the bipartisan spirit of GM's rescue and the rest of the U.S. auto industry.

"If we had gone down," he said, "the supply chain would have gone down. … And Ford was hanging on by its fingernails, too."

GM's failure also would have led to Detroit's collapse, Akerson said. "I have not seen a city in this bad a shape since I went to East Berlin in 1969."

dshepardson@detnews.com

(202) 662-8735

"The only enemy of guns is rust and politicians."
“You can roll manure in powered sugar but it still ain’t a jelly donut”

"The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry."

William F. Buckley, Jr.
"Unarmed helplessness is for sheep and the French."  Ted Nugent



Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 10:08 AM | Reply #1 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 02/24/2010
Location: ND
 
 
Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 10:17 AM | Reply #2 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 12/01/2008
Location: ND
"Ford Chairman Bill Ford Jr. has previously advocated a gas tax increase."

I guess Ford had the same idea too.  I don't like the idea either.

"Diligence is the mother of good luck."
Benjamin Franklin

Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 10:19 AM | Reply #3 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/30/2002
Location: ND
I dont agree on the gas tax hike but I totally agree with the bottom portion about cutting the hell out of the budget along with increasing tax rates or at least rolling back the Bush tax cuts. We simply CANNOT afford to try to take on the debt problem by budget cutting alone, simply is not possible.

Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 10:51 AM | Reply #4 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 02/08/2006
Location: ND
I often think about how most of us have to save some money, have a garage sale, and do a little horse trading just to get a new fishing pole. The government and big business like the auto industry would rather manipulate or make some new laws that  affect several million people in order to make a few more billion dollars

Don't make much sense to me...
"If you are not working to protect hunting, then you are working to destroy it.” Fred Bear
Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 11:00 AM | Reply #5 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 10/31/2003
Location: ND
nd_bowhunter Said:
I often think about how most of us have to save some money, have a garage sale, and do a little horse trading just to get a new fishing pole. The government and big business like the auto industry would rather manipulate or make some new laws that  affect several million people in order to make a few more billion dollars

Don't make much sense to me...
I thought I was one of the few that had to do this!

Captain Josh Burgett

www.jig-em-up-guide-service.com

Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 11:38 AM | Reply #6 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/06/2002
Location: ND
walleye101 Said:
I dont agree on the gas tax hike but I totally agree with the bottom portion about cutting the hell out of the budget along with increasing tax rates or at least rolling back the Bush tax cuts. We simply CANNOT afford to try to take on the debt problem by budget cutting alone, simply is not possible.



 We are not going to tax our way out of this spending problem. Revenues have dropped in large part due to the number of people currently unemployed. Spending since 2006 has been out of control. So like any good administrator, house budget manager the first thing you do is get your spending under control period or your lenders will do it for you!

I live in Fargo, and on a local level I watch and listen to the debates taking place in MN. The Rep controlled house and senate have passed a balanced budget with no new taxes in MN yet the Dem Gov wants an additional $1.8 billion dollars in additional spending and wants to raise taxes to do it. Granted he wants to only tax the RICH as he says, if this spending is so important than raise the taxes on everyone!

ND is a good example to look at, in that Rep or Dem given revenue they spend it with little thought of sustained revenue coming in. We have been lucky in ND that oil production has boomed, but all that aside our elected officials spent way more money on projects that they should not have and did not fund programs and projects they should have.

It is clear that revenue is not the issue, but spending priority! Until that is under control not another dime of new revenue should be looked at! But if people keep buying into the crapola spewed that we need more revenue to fix the problem they need to look in the mirror because they are the problem!
In my lifetime I have seen fence row to fence row farming and the return of CRP and game to the landscape.Now we face again the prosepect of fence row to fence row again! Sportsman are our own worst enemy in that we fail to look forward and focus to much on the now!
Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 11:40 AM | Reply #7 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 02/28/2007
Location: ND
walleye101 Said:
I dont agree on the gas tax hike but I totally agree with the bottom portion about cutting the hell out of the budget along with increasing tax rates or at least rolling back the Bush tax cuts. We simply CANNOT afford to try to take on the debt problem by budget cutting alone, simply is not possible.

worked for Reagan.  He cut taxes and the revenue to the government skyrocketed.  Now had he been able to get congress to cut spending it would have been unbelievable. 

Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 11:47 AM | Reply #8 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/30/2002
Location: ND
A big difference in what we have now and what Reagan has it the debt itself. In a few years from now the interest alone on the debt will be a HUGE portion of the federal budget. 14 TRILLION and counting makes it pretty hard to combat the problem without increasing tax rates. If you look at going back to the pre-Bush era tax rates, it is not a HUGE jump for most people.  Add to the fact that the future promises that all baby boomers are counting on in Social Security and Medicaid/Medicare and you get one heck of a budget nightmare.

Every option will be on the table in the upcoming months I would say. I would much rather see the income and corp taxes going back to what they were rather than a large increase in cap gains or other marginal tax rates.

Tax rate increases coupled with major spending cuts would be much easier on the economy than allowing the debt to grow to a level of allowing the credit rating to be downgraded. That would knock this country back many years if that was allowed to happen.
Re: another reason not to buy GM
by on 06/07/2011 11:49 AM | Reply #9 | "Quote" | "Quick Reply" |

Joined: 11/21/2005
Location: ND
walleye101 Said:
I dont agree on the gas tax hike but I totally agree with the bottom portion about cutting the hell out of the budget along with increasing tax rates or at least rolling back the Bush tax cuts. We simply CANNOT afford to try to take on the debt problem by budget cutting alone, simply is not possible.


Obama does this and does that. All for who''s good  Look at his budget why do the dems always want to spend sure the repubs spend also but not neaar as much as the dems.  Cut all government programs until spending equals whaat is taken in. .

The best democrat platform a Republican can stand on it a manure pile

drug test everyone on welfare

have an open season on molesters

9 Replies | Page 1 of 11 | Top of Page | Bottom of Page
Posted By:
Posted On: 06/07/2011 09:57 AM
840 Views, 9 Comments

Tags: akerson, mdash, gas, tax, detroit, higher, reason, news, taxes, last
More Tags: Dan Akerson, General Motors Co., USD, Barack Obama, United States, Ford, higher gas tax, Rebecca Lindland, Detroit, Europe, Congress, David Whiston, Bill Ford Jr., CEO, The Detroit News, New Orleans, Berlin, CBS, Chrysler, IHS Global Insight, Morningstar, Japan, cent, dshepardson@detnews.com, Bankruptcy, energy policy, higher gas taxes, gas tax increase, gas taxes, federal gas tax, higher gas-mileage standards, once-bankrupt automaker, higher gas, gas tax, oil prices, Obama administration, Rick Wagoner, Christina Rogers, Peter Hart, David Shepardson, (202) 662-8735, President, auto analyst, politician, spokeswoman, Chairman, analyst, owner, Middle East, Face the Nation, Business_Finance
Region: North Dakota

Categories: Other > Politics
Rate This ForumTopic
  • Currently 0/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

0/5 (0 votes cast)

You must be signed in to comment on this topic